Subject: Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 1996/07/26
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

[Kent Pitman]

|   I think you meant "apparent" value.  The rest of this message is what
|   you get for leaving out little words like that. ;-)

and had I not left it out I would have lost the opportunity to read your
excellent explanations and thus understand part of the rationale...

thanks for taking the time to explain it.