Subject: Re: standardization (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software) From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 1996/10/07 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <email@example.com> [Tim Bradshaw] | Obvious I/O type things that CL is missing are random access to files I must have missed something. Is not `file-position' random access? | (of course they might be very hard to standardise...) `file-position' was already present in CLtL1 in 1984. #\Erik -- I could tell you, but then I would have to reboot you.