Subject: Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 1996/11/18 Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.ai.genetic,comp.ai.neural-nets,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.unix.programmer,comp.ai.philosophy Message-ID: <email@example.com> * Mukesh Prasad | First you assume I don't know Lisp ... it's an undeniable, irrefutable _fact_ that you don't know Lisp or anything you have been saying about interpreters in this thread. the proof is in your own articles. if you did know Lisp, you could not have said anything of what you have said. it would be a crime of logic to conclude anything _other_ than that you do not know what you're talking about. #\Erik -- Please address private replies to "erik". Mail to "nobody" is discarded.