Subject: Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 1997/04/20 Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.scheme.scsh,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.functional,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.eiffel Message-ID: <email@example.com> * Paul Wilson | You could build a language based on Lisp/Scheme technology with a more | conventional syntax, and more redundant keywords. * Fergus Henderson | Sure, you could, but has anyone done it? yes. it's called DYLAN, for DYnamic LANguage. see comp.lang.dylan. #\Erik -- I'm no longer young enough to know everything.