Subject: Re: Lisp *is* *fast*, was Re: lisp is *SLOW* From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 1997/08/18 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.c++,comp.programming Message-ID: <email@example.com> * Bulent Murtezaoglu | So while you see web pages proudly displaying "Lisp is faster than C" | examples, you will not see "CLOS is faster than C++" examples because | even if you restrict CLOS functionality to what you can do in C++, you | cannot get comparable efficiency. That's all I'm saying. I actually haven't seen any comparisons at all between C++ and CLOS. I'm sure you have, so I would be interested in looking at them and running them on my own. #\Erik -- man who cooks while hacking eats food that has died twice.