Subject: Re: merge-pathnames From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 1998/04/20 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <email@example.com> * Andy Brezing | Some question to a the CL implementation on a UNIX platform of | 'merge-pathnames'. I would like to change the pathname-type of a pathname | by using 'merge-pathnames'. well, if you insist on MERGE-PATHNAMES: (merge-pathnames (make-pathname :type "kll") <default>) but I would recommend (make-pathname :type "kll" :defaults <default>) | Which version of 'merge-pathnames' might be wrong? both may be correct. please note that just trying a Lisp implementation without knowing what to expect is not a very good way to understand what the language does. in particular, CLISP implements only what the authors agree to, without any form of commitment to conformance. note that MERGE-PATHNAMES is not specified to take strings as arguments, but "pathname designators". strings are processed by PARSE-NAMESTRING to become pathnames. this means that you will find out what you get by evaluating (describe (parse-namestring ".kll")) in the available Common Lisp environments. (ordinarily, it would be enough to do (describe #P".kll"), but CLISP doesn't seem to think #P is worth implementing, either, at least not in the latest version I could get to build here.) #:Erik -- Abort, Retry, or Upgrade?