Subject: Re: How is Lisp "better"?
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 1998/08/17
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp.x,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme
Message-ID: <>

* (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
| ... and nonsense for Scheme.

  Scheme is not a Lisp in this regard (as in several others).  if you
  insist on calling Scheme a Lisp, confusions like this will crop up.

-- is about my spam protection scheme and how
  to guarantee that you reach me.  in brief: if you reply to a news article
  of mine, be sure to include an In-Reply-To or References header with the
  message-ID of that message in it.  otherwise, you need to read that page.