From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Backquote considered bizzare (was Re: loading Emacs-Lisp into CL) Date: 1999/02/25 Message-ID: <3128952000872124@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 448375634 References: <36D2BC01.708622FD@elwood.com> <36D429CD.9A17CBB@elwood.com> <36D45172.5EA34D89@IntelliMarket.Com> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Kelly Murray | Another area where there exist major room for improvement in CL... it doesn't appear that you want to use Common Lisp at all, but it also doesn't appear that you have any gripes more fundamental than syntactic aesthetics. what gives? this is a part of the language you can change at will, but there simply is no need to do this in Common Lisp. speaking of which, I explained to the British guy sitting next to me on a recent transatlantic flight that I worked with Common Lisp. he in turn talked about his great hobby: ornithology, where "common" is a synonym for "garden", as in "garden variety". he thought it would have better acceptance if it was called "Garden Lisp". feel free to use it, Kelly. #:Erik