From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Best Lisp for Windows NT?
Date: 1999/05/04
Message-ID: <3134816211797975@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 473921801
References: <372c9359.702572255@news.earthlink.net> <m3r9ozl184.fsf@eho.eaglets.com> <372de455.723304977@news.earthlink.net> <3134715279176341@naggum.no> <372e9030.832835754@news.earthlink.net>
mail-copies-to: never
Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; http://www.naggum.no
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* please-reply-in-the-forum@thank.you
| It's a reasonable assumption ...

  you should instead be justifying your _response_ when this assumption
  failed.  I don't care what your assumptions are, and there's no need to
  defend it, unless you want to make the picture of how you react when your
  assumptions fail even more complete, but why bother?

  you could have found the prices by now, too.

#:Erik