Subject: Re: CMUCL and EQUAL hash tables
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 1999/06/04
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* (Fredrik Sandstrom)
| There never was a substitute for understanding the problem before trying
| to respond. ;-)


| However, I notice that my original sentence above is misleading -- I did
| not use an array with a fill-pointer as a hash key, but I used one to do
| hash table lookup.  The transcript should have made this clear.

  ok, I tend to ignore examples when whatever they are intended to be
  examples of is sufficiently well explained.  that didn't work this time.
  looking at your transcript, I agree that GETHASH should work with any old
  string EQUAL to the key.

@1999-07-22T00:37:33Z -- pi billion seconds since the turn of the century