Subject: Re: compiler technology (was: Re: CMU CL vs. CLISP?)
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 1999/07/27
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3142072824912106@naggum.no>

* Bruno Haible
| But I was also talking about CMUCL - how should they get at such a machine?

  your point is certainly valid for CMUCL, but your extrapolation to other
  native Common Lisp implementations leaves something to be desired in its
  applicability.

#:Erik
-- 
  suppose we blasted all politicians into space.
  would the SETI project find even one of them?