From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: cautios question (about languages) Date: 1999/08/09 Message-ID: <3143197512198512@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 510609772 References: <379EA681.4CE3B3F9@inka.de> <379ECCC4.1D4269CA@iname.com> <3142312709244016@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879; +1 510 435 8604; http://www.naggum.no Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Christopher Browne | Are you just a vulgar CLer that read anti-CL sentiment into questions | whether such sentiment was intended or not? well, I recognize _your_ intent. | When he has asked about several possible paradigms, and how CL might fit | with them, how, precisely does this represent an implication that CL must | forcibly be "reduced" to use one paradigm? because the questions asked did not indicate that the requestor understood that multiple paradigms could be supported by one language. | I think you're seeing a conspiracy of "Evil Schemers" against CL where | there isn't one. I can beat that: I _know_ you see evil intentions that aren't there. I also think you're stupid who can't see more than one way to read my anti-Scheme articles and go on to fault me for your own poor vision. #:Erik -- suppose we blasted all politicians into space. would the SETI project find even one of them?