Subject: Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: 1999/09/10 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Reini Urban | using macros just not to evaluate one of its arguments is lame. | lambdas are better. then why don't you just program in Scheme? sometimes, I think the Lisp1 vs Lispn thing really _is_ about doing things one way or one of n ways. what I really _don't_ understand is why Scheme freaks need to _prove_ Kent's points. it would seem much more rational to work very hard to _disprove_ all his claims. #:Erik -- it's election time in Norway. explains everything, doesn't it?