Subject: Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: 1999/09/12 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Kent M Pitman <email@example.com> | It's also "cambridge common lisp" (an old name for Hqn's lisp, I think; | lots of Harlequin system code uses #+ccl/#-ccl. sigh.) OK, I know what I want for the "revision" of ANSI Common Lisp: the specification of a registry of feature symbols, to be handled by a registration authority. this could also be an additional standard. the registry would have to pre-register all known feature symbols and accept collisions but also list how to disambiguate, but no new features should collide. #:Erik -- it's election time in Norway. explains everything, doesn't it?