From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32 Date: 2000/02/25 Message-ID: <3160457752126919@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 589800269 References: <88k8ar$jsp$1@news.campuscwix.net> <38ada <38b18020.0@flint.sentex.net> <3160337334524020@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 951471002 14578 195.0.192.66 (25 Feb 2000 09:30:02 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; +47 8800 8879 or +1 510 435 8604; fax: +47 2210 9077; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Feb 2000 09:30:02 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Ole Myren Rohne | At this point, why does Erik Naggum paraphrase the original message | instead of quoting from it: you're quoting the wrong article, dude, and I wasn't responding to the original article in the first place. get it straight or shut up. try <4C7AF620DF436092.095BE5DCC793D4D1.593A48AFDF2C5EAB@lp.airnews.net> instead, with my response in <3159728504708010@naggum.no>. if you need evidence that quoting doesn't really help in understanding what's going on in a debate, consider your own reactions to what you have read. you, too, make assumptions about what people mean that go far beyond any actually quotable text. so, too, with everybody else. the sooner you understand this, the less you will fall prey to assigning malicous intent to people, which it _seems_ you don't want others (i.e., me) to do, but keep doing yourself, towards me. I don't particularly respect such hypocricy, if that has been unclear up until now. oK? #:Erik