Re: (loop for ? in ? finally ?) - Naggum cll archive

Subject: Re: (loop for ? in ? finally ?)
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 2000/02/25
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3160481213819408@naggum.no>

* "Fernando D. Mato Mira" <matomira@iname.com>
| Then why not just erasing every sentence saying "is undefined" or "is
| unspecified"?

  primarily because we're human readers in dire need of redundancy.

  secondarily because sometimes a requirement may seem to or actually imply
  a too broad claim and may therefore need to be abridged or partially
  retracted.

#:Erik