From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses Date: 2000/03/28 Message-ID: <3163275695429682@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 603656583 References: <38DBE821.F64C2B22@genworks.com> <3163031395198264@naggum.no> <8bneig$6s8$4@ssauraaa-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <86r9cwf2ec.fsf@g.local> <4u2hrgif8.fsf@beta.franz.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 954291638 16798 195.0.192.66 (29 Mar 2000 01:00:38 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Mar 2000 01:00:38 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Duane Rettig | I've seen most of the style arguments based on philosophy posted on this | thread, but there is one argument I have not yet seen. [match the | results of the pretty printer.] I like this argument. I think we can sum it up like this: there is no whitespace after an opening parenthesis. there is no whitespace before a closing parenthesis. this is the law. if you break it, it is not pretty. #:Erik