From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses Date: 2000/04/02 Message-ID: <3163690209543717@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 605742269 References: <38DBE821.F64C2B22@genworks.com> <3163031395198264@naggum.no> <8bneig$6s8$4@ssauraaa-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <8btbto$6uh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8bv5bh$j5p$1@ssauraaa-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <8c03f1$9il$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c05ub$i6u$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> <3163496610594768@naggum.no> <8c2m28$jj0$1@ssauraab-i-1.production.compuserve.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 954703488 12899 195.0.192.66 (2 Apr 2000 19:24:48 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Apr 2000 19:24:48 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Anthony Cartmell" | Thanks for agreeing with me when I say that in Emacs the indentation is | based on the parens. such has never been disputed. you're amazingly exasperating, you know that? | So Andy is wrong when he said that I don't understand how Emacs indents | Lisp. well, I'm sorry, but you don't. as commonly used, "based on" indicates a necessary condition but _not_ a sufficient one, and this is indeed the case in this situation, as has been pointed out to you. #:Erik