Subject: Re: setf & setq - revisiting
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 2000/04/17
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* ;; h e l m e r . . . <>
| i'm revisitng my initial question because i found something on a scheme
| site that clarifies (i hope) and gives me very basic definitions,
| probelm is, i have to make sure it's lisp too . . .

  it isn't.  on top of it, it's completely bogus, because ...

| [note i have taken these statements where sheme's 'define' = 'setf' in
| lisp and similarly 'set!' = 'setq']

  ... this is completely unfounded.

  please forget comparing Scheme and Lisp for now, but feel free to try
  again when you know both exceedingly well on their own merits.