From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: setf & setq - revisiting Date: 2000/04/17 Message-ID: <3164940958803214@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 612199002 References: <8bbcad$oo2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8dcsec$8io$1@nnrp1.deja.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 955973239 13864 195.0.192.66 (17 Apr 2000 12:07:19 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Apr 2000 12:07:19 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * ;; h e l m e r . . . | i'm revisitng my initial question because i found something on a scheme | site that clarifies (i hope) and gives me very basic definitions, | probelm is, i have to make sure it's lisp too . . . it isn't. on top of it, it's completely bogus, because ... | [note i have taken these statements where sheme's 'define' = 'setf' in | lisp and similarly 'set!' = 'setq'] ... this is completely unfounded. please forget comparing Scheme and Lisp for now, but feel free to try again when you know both exceedingly well on their own merits. #:Erik