From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: getting a full symbol name Date: 2000/04/27 Message-ID: <3165868104954676@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 616564142 References: <5174E9F018ADFCCC.F6B53EE0A06D6DC9.5CE6E22D206AE3C2@lp.airnews.net> <3165125191606936@naggum.no> <863doh4v0t.fsf@g.local> <86hfcni2zq.fsf@g.local> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 956879406 24015 195.0.192.66 (27 Apr 2000 23:50:06 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Apr 2000 23:50:06 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Barry Margolin | Why complicate things to accomodate something that no sensible | person would do? well, thank you. maybe some sensible person saw that it would be a waste to create a dummy package to have symbols always print with a package qualifier? the answer is, of course: to get it right, always. | Does it really matter if keywords don't display as expected after | doing (in-package :keyword)? yes. this is Common Lisp, not Java or C++ or Perl. remember? #:Erik