From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: `letf' in Common Lisp?
Date: 2000/06/14
Message-ID: <3170001575319347@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 634592757
References: <b87wvk81mk2.fsf@adroa.uio.no> <3168928070841171@naggum.no> <c29em6eum6o.fsf@mint-square.mit.edu> <3169102484898761@naggum.no> <c29zoosnzvd.fsf@mint-square.mit.edu> <3169720630871403@naggum.no> <r9a47wuh.fsf@alum.mit.edu> <3169797928935247@naggum.no> <hfay9866.fsf@alum.mit.edu> <ey31z22eszf.fsf@cley.com> <d7lm91il.fsf@alum.mit.edu> <3169841934681062@naggum.no> <8zwa8jj1.fsf@alum.mit.edu> <39479B13.9C8CA93E@franz.com> <3947DF15.3AFF@synquiry.com>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961013363 8614 195.0.192.66 (14 Jun 2000 20:09:23 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2000 20:09:23 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Jon S Anthony <jsa@synquiry.com>
| Could you point out where in the standard it indicates that an
| implementation may ignore a free type declaration if it obeys a
| bound one?

  This is a completely bogus question.  Pull yourself together and
  _think_ carefully about what you request from the standard, and to
  what level of redundant detail it had to go if it were able to
  answer your question.

#:Erik, sighing
-- 
  If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.