From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT? Date: 2000/06/22 Message-ID: <3170694855029772@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 637775377 References: <39526DB6.3577D730@bluewin.ch> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961706295 16278 195.0.192.66 (22 Jun 2000 20:38:15 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Jun 2000 20:38:15 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * ebfg01@bluewin.ch | Well, what I found did not leave me very enthusiastic. Neither was your incredibly negative message. Why, precisely, do you need help when you have made up so much of your mind? Pardon my prejudice against such articles (and surely you don't have anything against prejudice who don't even bother to test a product based on prejudice), but we're going to have another round of "oh, I like Lisp, but I cannot use it in my environment", which I just _hate_. | Although I can understand that Windows is not the preferred platform | for many people (mine remains the Symbolics I used many years ago), | I am not sure that ignoring the platform used by a large majority of | people makes sense. You're wrong, of course, but why bother improving on your negativity? #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.