From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Lisp XML parser ? Date: 2000/06/25 Message-ID: <3170887293703353@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 638621617 References: <39523341.CED20EE@bbn.com> <3170682110777797@naggum.no> <3dm3kuya.fsf@supelec.fr> <3170880537253039@naggum.no> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961899010 12801 195.0.192.66 (25 Jun 2000 02:10:10 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 2000 02:10:10 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Christopher Browne | But "Document Object Model" contains the word "Object," so it _MUST_ | be object oriented. Right? The people behind DOM are much less stupid than this implies, so there's a possibility you're attempting to use this stupid snide remark towards me, instead. But regardless, couldn't you instead try to be somewhat constructive in your comments? Bogus as it is, DOM doesn't deserve outright _disrespect_, lest we thus hinder any better ideas along the same axis grow, too. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.