From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Access the the second return value? Date: 2000/06/28 Message-ID: <3171179407863670@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 639958223 References: <3959B48D.835EA63E@spam.com> <87aeg65h7a.fsf@q-software-solutions.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962195534 24704 195.0.192.66 (28 Jun 2000 12:32:14 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jun 2000 12:32:14 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Paul Foley | Argh! I am the only one that's bothered by this godawful Schemish | use of `?' in symbols for "predicate" functions/values? No, but it's a very useful thing, this little question mark, as it communicates there's little hope of getting the person using it to stop thinking in Scheme when writing in Common Lisp. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.