From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Access the the second return value?
Date: 2000/06/29
Message-ID: <3171274968612040@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 640407795
References: <3959B48D.835EA63E@spam.com> <87aeg65h7a.fsf@q-software-solutions.com> <m24s6e2km8.fsf@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz> <u8zvqnfnd.fsf@res.raytheon.com> <3171189838798439@naggum.no> <uvgytn2h6.fsf@res.raytheon.com> <3171206428191286@naggum.no> <slrn8ll55b.2sd.cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962288009 6433 195.0.192.66 (29 Jun 2000 14:13:29 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jun 2000 14:13:29 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Christopher Browne
| Worse still, it's more likely due, not to Scheme, but rather to
| _Forth_.
| 
| : add2! dup @ 2 + ! ;

  I find this _highly_ unlikely.

#:Erik, who wrote a Forth interpreter for fun for a PDP-10 in 1982.
-- 
  If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.