From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Access the the second return value? Date: 2000/07/02 Message-ID: <3171547074485720@naggum.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 641540429 References: <3959B48D.835EA63E@spam.com> <87aeg65h7a.fsf@q-software-solutions.com> <87itutcge8.fsf@quadium.net> <8jj3sn$ikm$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com> <3171439197402294@naggum.net> <395e5892@news.sentex.net> <395f46bf$1_2@spamkiller.newsfeeds.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962558335 27256 195.0.192.66 (2 Jul 2000 17:18:55 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Jul 2000 17:18:55 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Janos Blazi" | Isn't it strange that early machine archtectures still have such an | impact on modern programming languages? No. Genuinely good ideas don't suddenly turn bad because of the passage of time. | This is the same as the zero terminated strings in C, No, it isn't. | but one would not expect this kind of thing in Lisp2! Lisp2? Take a look at LDB and DPB some day you're prepared for a shock. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.