From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Access the the second return value? Date: 2000/07/03 Message-ID: <3171634783182003@naggum.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 641908289 References: <3959B48D.835EA63E@spam.com> <87aeg65h7a.fsf@q-software-solutions.com> <87itutcge8.fsf@quadium.net> <8jj3sn$ikm$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com> <3171439197402294@naggum.net> <395e5892@news.sentex.net> <395f46bf$1_2@spamkiller.newsfeeds.com> <3171547074485720@naggum.net> <395f84dd_2@spamkiller.newsfeeds.com> <395fb14e@news.sentex.net> <39607dcd_4@spamkiller.newsfeeds.com> <3171623893332559@naggum.net> <3960c6db_4@spamkiller.newsfeeds.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962645988 4948 195.0.192.66 (3 Jul 2000 17:39:48 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://naggum.no; http://naggum.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jul 2000 17:39:48 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * "Janos Blazi" | You take my (and anybody's) sentences as if they were mathematical | statements and then you check if they are true in the strict | mathematical sense. Wrong. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.