From ... Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!129.240.148.23!uio.no!Norway.EU.net!127.0.0.1!nobody From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: corba or sockets? Date: 01 Nov 2000 17:25:36 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 800 35477; gsm: +47 93 256 360; fax: +47 93 270 868; http://naggum.no; http://naggum.net Lines: 16 Message-ID: <3182088336408296@naggum.net> References: <3181895804626114@naggum.net> <6xitq9fijb.fsf@lant.be> <6xy9z5do78.fsf@lant.be> <3182017393789471@naggum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 973099576 20643 195.0.192.66 (1 Nov 2000 17:26:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Nov 2000 17:26:16 GMT mail-copies-to: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.lisp:3048 * Philip Lijnzaad | XML or text/plain is just slower to parse than a binary datastream | of which you know the layout. This claim is not at all supported by the evidence. Parsing a binary data stream that claims to be general and not just a dump of bytes from memory, is just as expensive to parse as text/plain and can quickly become _slower_ if you do it wrong and need a lot of overhead to overcome the inherent problems of binary representation. The arguments for binary datastreams are space and bandwidth, _not_ time to process. #:Erik -- Does anyone remember where I parked Air Force One? -- George W. Bush