Subject: Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc. From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: 2000/11/29 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | You purposely inflict pain on people in order to make them get rid of | their knee-jerk reactions (see Message-ID: | <email@example.com>). This is behaviourism, is it not? If you add about a million other bogus things, you might end up with behaviourism. If you don't, you don't end up with behaviourism. I have not added the million other things. You seem to think you have the right to ignore that they need to be added. That's just idiotic. | If we *dont* understand each other, just forget the previous paragraph | and tell me how i misunderstood your post with Message-ID: | <firstname.lastname@example.org> instead. I should tell you how you misunderstood something you don't give any clue to how you understood!? What's wrong with your thinking ability? #:Erik -- Solution to U.S. Presidential Election Crisis 2000: Let Texas secede from the Union and elect George W. Bush their very first President. All parties, states would rejoice.