From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Round to the nearest whole number? Date: 2000/12/04 Message-ID: <3184962203555403@naggum.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 701162680 References: <271120001453264352%sungwoo@cad.strath.ac.uk> <271120001510300782%sungwoo@cad.strath.ac.uk> <3A228DA5.9A61BD27@cwcom.net> <3184450468066295@naggum.net> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 975975422 26010 195.0.192.66 (5 Dec 2000 00:17:02 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 800 35477; gsm: +47 93 256 360; fax: +47 93 270 868; http://naggum.no; http://naggum.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Dec 2000 00:17:02 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Stefan Simbuerger | What do you mean by "unmathematical"? An exaggeration intended to be so blatantly exaggerated that it would at least seem somewhat humorous to at least one person beside myself. With a rounding function called "penny-theft" and words like "less rebelliously", I'm _amazed_ that not a single soul could lighten up. #:Erik, sighing -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown