Subject: Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp? From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:55:42 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Robert Gonzalez <email@example.com> > You need to re-read the original to see how irrelevant that whole > paragraph was. I would need to be you to see how irrelevant that whole paragraph was. I am not you. I do not have your hypersensitivity to this issue. In my eyes, it was a joke. To you, it is getting closer and closer to a master thesis on the relevance of indinvidual paragraphs in USENET articles. I have not read the rest of your article. It did not appear relevant to either XML or Common Lisp, but rather extremely relevant only to yourself. However, if relevance was such an issue, you would not have talked about this here. Ergo, relevance is _not_ your issue. In other words, you need to examine your whole article to see how irrelevant it is here. Drop it and move on. #:Erik -- There is nothing in this message that under normal circumstances should cause Barry Margolin to announce his moral superiority over others, but one never knows how he needs to behave to maintain his belief in it.