Subject: Re: the "loop" macro
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:10:00 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3208086598241439@naggum.net>

* John Foderaro <jkf@unspamx.franz.com>
> Now we have Erik telling everyone that I can't publish my code if it
> contains a macro he doesn't like.

  The more you continue to misrepresent what I have said, the more people
  will realize what the real problem is.  I have a profound trust in the
  ability of people to see through the kind of unintelligent manipulation
  that you and some really stupid politicians engage in when they run out
  of arguments.

> The fact is that Erik really doesn't care about if*, unless.. etc.

  From someone who has already done a marvellous job of proving that he
  cannot distinguish fact from fiction, I am impressed that you found the
  need to prove it to us.

> What's really happening here is that I was added to his enemies list a
> while ago.

  There is no such thing outside of your deranged mind.

> I'm not sure what put me there but that's where I am.

  You are not sure?  Geez.  You destroyed my trust in Franz Inc's ability
  to be a business partner when I was looking at another Common Lisp
  project.  Through your amazing stupidity and your idiotic desire to break
  with the standard over actually supporting Common Lisp projects, you made
  it abundantly clear that I could no longer take any financial risks that
  involved Franz Inc as a supplier.  This did not make you an enemy, though.

> Given any topic and choosing any side, Erik can turn the flame gun on and
> toast the other side.

  Yup, you're the guy who speaks only for yourself.

> I guess he was bored and saw this thread winding down, saw that a member
> of his enemies list was in the discussion and fired up the flame gun.

  Geez.  Disrespect for people who are smarter than you seems to be deeply
  ingrained.

> His statements have been so ludicrous that I didn't figure anyone would
> buy into them (after all who's ever been flamed for using a macro they
> defined themselves and the source of which is available).

  That is so not what you have been flamed for.  Your constant manipulative
  deception is what you get flamed for.  Get some professional help.

> This will be my last post on this thread.

  I wish.

///