From ...
Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!npeer.kpnqwest.net!reader3.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Promoting CL Was: What I want from my Common Lisp vendor and the Common Lisp community
References: <3208226254834485@naggum.net> <867kvke4iz.fsf@gondolin.local.net> <3208254606019619@naggum.net> <1f4c5c5c.0108311044.2399e124@posting.google.com> <xcvpu9b6hg8.fsf@apocalypse.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> <1f4c5c5c.0108312034.1b1e140a@posting.google.com> <sfwpu9b1k8c.fsf@world.std.com> <1f4c5c5c.0109011022.72a56a2b@posting.google.com> <sfwzo8eh9h0.fsf@world.std.com> <1f4c5c5c.0109012324.43d24c7@posting.google.com> <3208404998010473@naggum.net> <87itf1a2fh.fsf_-_@piracy.red-bean.com> <99fb3972.0109021504.bba92d0@posting.google.com> <3208475381413624@naggum.net> <MPG.15fca7683180ccba989705@news.dnai.com> <3208495354884218@naggum.net> <MPG.15fd1848e25b8b1a989706@news.dnai.com> <3208515900839780@naggum.net> <MPG.15fd385e636fc08f989708@news.dnai.com> <86g0a3qlio.fsf@gondolin.local.net> <MPG.15fe6862eff3e6b8989710@news.dnai.com> <3208608593527712@naggum.net> <n7ypu96sgpr.fsf@panix1.panix.com> <3208637120220622@naggum.net> <3b9660e2.433898@News.CIS.DFN.DE>
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Message-ID: <3208701692752587@naggum.net>
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 18:01:35 GMT
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net
X-Trace: reader3.kpnqwest.net 999712895 193.71.66.49 (Wed, 05 Sep 2001 20:01:35 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 20:01:35 MET DST
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:15686

* _shabbir_@yahoo.com (Shab)
> I would reommend an appointment with a shrink and extended homeopathic
> treatment.  Erik, you should read you own (non-technical) posts
> sometimes to see how irrelevant _they_ are.  You may sure be a smart
> guy with Lisp, but otherwise you fail to understand people or what
> they seem to be saying or the context _completely_ and _utterly_.

  How did you see into my mind and discover what I did not _understand_
  just because I point out that it is completely irrelevant?  Does this
  somehow trigger your defense mechanisms such that you need to post your
  personal comments about someone else, which is certainly completely and
  utterly irrelevant here?

  Please accept a hint: Understanding and agreement are orthogonal.

///