Subject: Re: CL-Emacs (was Re: Multiple LISP's?)
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 06:44:07 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Peter Wood <>
> Those who argue that emacs needs to be redesigned/rewritten using CL
> are doomed to spend the rest of their lives *talking* about it on CLL.

  Or they wisely shut up about it.

  Why did that stupid George W. Bush turn to Christian fundamentalism to
  fight Islamic fundamentalism?  Why use terms like "crusade", which only
  invokes fear of a repetition of that disgraceful period of Christianity
  with its _sustained_ terrorist attacks on Islam?  He is _such_ an idiot.