Subject: Re: CL-Emacs (was Re: Multiple LISP's?) From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 06:44:07 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Peter Wood <email@example.com> > Those who argue that emacs needs to be redesigned/rewritten using CL > are doomed to spend the rest of their lives *talking* about it on CLL. Or they wisely shut up about it. /// -- Why did that stupid George W. Bush turn to Christian fundamentalism to fight Islamic fundamentalism? Why use terms like "crusade", which only invokes fear of a repetition of that disgraceful period of Christianity with its _sustained_ terrorist attacks on Islam? He is _such_ an idiot.