From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.238.2.15!skynet.be!skynet.be!newsfeed.esat.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc1.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader3.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: CLISP `executables' (idiot question) References: Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3212349202022646@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 23:13:22 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@Norway.EU.net X-Trace: nreader3.kpnqwest.net 1003360402 193.71.66.49 (Thu, 18 Oct 2001 01:13:22 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 01:13:22 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:18058 * Sam Steingold | First, this is a CLISP-specific question, best asked on | (see http://clisp.cons.org). Why do you work so hard for this separation of the Lisp community? What if some people who do not use CLISP today would switch to it if they saw answers to questions they would not have asked? And why favor mailing lists and web pages when news is such a technically superior medium? /// -- Five weeks. I have seen all the news coverage I can take for a the rest of the year. Let me know when life has returned to normal. Thank you.