From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news2.kpn.net!news.kpn.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc3.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: SETF : Ambiguous? References: <8078c580.0111220403.5878d88f@posting.google.com> <3215431275217808@naggum.net> <9tja3e$h1p$1@news1.wdf.sap-ag.de> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3215443310284855@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:41:51 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1006454511 193.71.66.49 (Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:41:51 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:41:51 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:20767 * Rene de Visser | Is it then the case then that all the standard macros in common lisp that | end up evaluating their arguements make sure that these evaluations occur | in a left to right direction w.r.t to the original macro parameters? Yes. | Do people pay much attention to this when writing their own macros? If they are smart and know the language, they do. | (I certainly haven't given any thought to this in the past when writing | my own macros.) Well, then you have written _really_ bad macros. /// -- Norway is now run by a priest from the fundamentalist Christian People's Party, the fifth largest party representing one eighth of the electorate. -- Carrying a Swiss Army pocket knife in Oslo, Norway, is a criminal offense.