From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news2.kpn.net!news.kpn.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader1.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: [NEWBIE] - Lisp or CLOS ? References: <2382dbbe.0111260641.497d93cd@posting.google.com> <87vgfxmrxz.fsf@kometknut.neitileu.no> <3215783792255809@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3215791360497487@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:22:41 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader1.kpnqwest.net 1006802561 193.71.66.49 (Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:22:41 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:22:41 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:20987 * Erik Naggum > I think this is one of those situations where it is important to > point out that CLOS is _Common_ Lisp. Although no other Lisps are > relevant in the third millennium :) * Robert Pluim | You don't consider emacs-lisp a lisp? (or perhaps you don't consider | it relevant, which I'd find surprising). I consider the statement I made somewhat sarcastic or perhaps sardonic. /// -- The past is not more important than the future, despite what your culture has taught you. Your future observations, conclusions, and beliefs are more important to you than those in your past ever will be. The world is changing so fast the balance between the past and the future has shifted.