From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.esat.net!nslave.kpnqwest.net!nloc.kpnqwest.net!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Why Arc isn't especially OO References: Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3217166502392064@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:21:44 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1008177704 193.71.66.49 (Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:21:44 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:21:44 MET Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:22297 * "Scott McKay" | Some years ago I suggested "protocol-oriented programming". That is probably _the_ most constructive suggestion I have seen. /// -- The past is not more important than the future, despite what your culture has taught you. Your future observations, conclusions, and beliefs are more important to you than those in your past ever will be. The world is changing so fast the balance between the past and the future has shifted.