Subject: Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 01:13:03 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Erik Naggum
> You will not deny that I never start any attacks at all.

* "Janos Blazi" <>
| I do deny it.

  Grow a brain, Janos Blazi.  It was a deliberate spoof of your idiotic
  line.  Too subtle for you, obviously.  Sigh, what a cretin you are.  Of
  course, I also actually mean it.  I criticize people's behavior harshly
  some times, but I do not _attack_ them.

| (1) Anette Stegmann posted some trange views here and then you told her
| that she was an idiot.

  Find the quote.  You will find that not only are you an unintelligent and
  despicably stupid person, you are also unable to remember well enough to
  avoid being exposed as a liar.  I kind of appreciate that you go to these
  lengths to prove what kind of character you are.

| (Now I do not like her too much [...])

  How amazing that you still do not understand that this newsgroup is not a
  forum to talk about what you like or not about other people.  This is the
  only topic of such a staggering amount of your posts that I doubt that
  you can even think in other terms than your feelings for people.

| (2) There was another case more recently where somebody said something you
| did not like and then you started attacking him immediately [...]

  This is an _example_?  Can you _be_ more vague?  You do not even want to
  do the legwork of finding the goddamn articles that are your examples!
  Could you _try_ to relate to the sheer exasperation that every reader of
  your inane babbling must experience?

  But since I remember it, let me tell you what it was: It was an example
  of an _intelligent_ response to criticism considered unfair.  How unusual
  that is!  He also took care to avoid the things he was criticized for.  I
  am sure you missed that.  Of course, you did not understand this, and
  failed to get the point completely.  How amazing that you do not even
  grasp this.

| Finally (now an attack follows) [...]

  What the hell is the _point_ with your annoying behavior?

| I tried to analyze the way you are and myself: [...]

  It is because you are a dog who needs a master who can tug your leash.
  The despicability of your servility is only matched by a behavior that
  only invites harsh responses.

| I think: as well as I can.

  No, you do not.  It would be a tragedy of biblical proportions of what
  you do is the best you can do.  A human being cannot actually _be_ so
  retarded and still find his way to Lisp.  That means there was once a
  glimmer of something that caused your miserably underutilized brain to
  work long enough to find Lisp.  That kind of random spark betrays a
  potential that you have chosen not to realize at all.  Idiot savants
  aside, really unintelligent people simply do not display the amount of
  sustained concentration necessary for them to discover something as out
  of the way and complex to learn (for them) as Lisp.  So you _must_ be
  playing the despicable, annoying moron.  Quit playing, and THINK!

  The past is not more important than the future, despite what your culture
  has taught you.  Your future observations, conclusions, and beliefs are
  more important to you than those in your past ever will be.  The world is
  changing so fast the balance between the past and the future has shifted.