Subject: Re: Nagging Naggum
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:55:56 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Jean-François Brouillet
| Why Naggum thinks that [...]

  I did not think that.  That you think so based on my response is _very_
  interesting.  You are not smart enough to understand that you were
  deliberately tricked into revealing your real position and purpose with a
  response that would feel hostile only if _you_ were a bad person.  Thank
  you for choosing the kind of response that leaves no doubt about you.

| Why would attacking Naggum be _interesting_ ? To whom ?

  Good.  You are defending yourself, now.  This is very good evidence of
  _conscious_ wrong-doing on your part.  You are a very bad person, which I
  wanted you to come out and tell us yourself, and you did, admirably.

  Your insistence on talking about me just because I point out that your
  considerable personality disorders are (sarcastically) _interesting_ is
  extremely revealing.  I can only thank you for relieving me of any need
  to demonstrate how you are a very bad person.  And you will continue to
  provide us with more evidence of your very bad character, if you are the
  character I judge you to be.  Go ahead, now.

| If attacking Naggum [...]

  Get psychiatric help, Jean-François Brouillet.  You need it.  This is
  obvious to me now, and it will be obvious to everyone else in a short
  while.  Please keep up the self-incrimination for the benefit of those
  who might still think that you could be normal, decent human being.