From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!news01.chello.se!news01.chello.no!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: one small function References: <3c5dcdc1$0$246$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <3c5e4689$0$62858$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <3c61470e$0$62901$edfadb0f@dspool01.news.tele.dk> <3222057684108542@naggum.net> <7fe97cc4.0202071936.43dfa93d@posting.google.com> <7fe97cc4.0202082302.28436d6d@posting.google.com> <3222297280586084@naggum.net> Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3222368981200717@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 22:29:39 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@chello.no X-Trace: news01.chello.no 1013380179 212.186.234.171 (Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:29:39 MET) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:29:39 MET X-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:29:49 MET (news01.chello.no) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:26175 * Erik Naggum > Intelligent people can be far more stupid than unintelligent people, > because the latter do not have the intellectual capacity of the former to > create a "better" world of their own in which they can pretend to liv, > and get away with it. Intelligence is merely higher ablity, stupidity is > the lack of skill in using whatever abilities you have. * gat@jpl.nasa.gov (Erann Gat) | stu·pid - adj. stu·pid·er, stu·pid·est | | 1.Slow to learn or understand; obtuse. | 2.Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes. | 3.Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | foolish or careless: a stupid mistake. | 4.Dazed, stunned, or stupefied. | 5.Pointless; worthless: a stupid job. I do not think you are supporting any actual disagreement with me. Both actions and people may be intelligent, but "intelligent" has a different meaning in each of those cases. Only meaning 1 above is therefore _actually_ related to intelligence, the rest of them are clearly supporting my take on this distinction, and _particularly_ meaning 3. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.