Subject: Re: looking for a language with any of the following 4 charachteristics (all 4 would be nice). From: Erik Naggum <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:15:25 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <email@example.com> * Len Charest <firstname.lastname@example.org> | It's a kind of Usenet terrorism. Better call George W. Bush and have him stage a war like you have never seen in order to squash this terrorism. Oh, come to think of it, that is _precisely_ what happens. I just happen to believe that posting idiotic drivel to a technical newsgroup is terrorism, and squash it. Gee, can it be as simple as differing priorities? Some people like nice people who say nothing controversial whatsoever. Other people like controversial people who make intellectually stimulating points. The two are largly incompatible from the outset. What I cannot figure out is that those touchy-feely guys are looking for in a technical newsgroup. | Of course, this message will probably put me on Erik's enemies list as | well. So be it. My supposed "enemies list" is another creation of Erann Gat. Like most everything else he imputes to me, it does of course not exist. You are entitled to your opinion, although you are clearly not sufficiently aware of what you think to make a worthwhile contribution to this forum. Why did you choose to make this vile crap your virgin post? This is what Erann Gat and his style encourages, and I am saddened to see someone like yourself lured into his trap out of overly emotional reasons. If you had kept this shit to yourself, you would not have _contributed_ to the hostile tone set by Erann Gat and others who mistakenly believe they fight evil, when they are themselves much worse than whatever it is they fight. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.