Subject: Re: Oh, and a little history From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:44:09 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Erik Naggum > But why do I bother to tell you things that I _expect_ that you will > respond to with 100% emotion and _no_ rational thought whatsoever? * Thomas Bushnell, BSG | The amazing thing is that this sentence is embedded in a message which, | um, is a big giant emotional diatribe, completely devoid of any content, | let alone some semblance of rationality. No, the most amazing thing is that it was rhetorical and had its own answer: > I believe you have the choice to think and _could_ exercise it. But you did not, exactly as I had expected. Your need to portray me as the psychotic delusion you suffer from is disturbing. You see things and refuse to listen to any advice to pull yourself together. But that is not my problem, any more. You have proven that you cannot think under the pressure you have created entirely on your own. Pretty damn stupid. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.