Subject: Re: What should S-expression based languages be called? (was: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp?) From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:12:34 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Kent M Pitman | Perhaps the plain fact that it's more important that they feel themselves | technically right than that they win friends? Hey, something wrong with that? /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.