Subject: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp? From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:51:39 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * William D Clinger | It probably surprises you that I was one of the people who pointed out | the need for this restriction when Common Lisp was being standardized. Yes, that surprises me. But thanks for the information, and also that it got that way. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.