Subject: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp? From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 17:40:03 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Thomas Bushnell, BSG | You protest that ozan s yigit has accompanied his request with "abusive | behavior". And yet you actually *do* exhibit abusive (and cowardly) | behavior every chance you get. Please quit projecting yourself onto me. | Rings a little hollow to hear you complain about someone else's allegedly | abusive behavior. Of course _you_ think it does. You, like ozan s yigit, have been incredibly abusive and blame me for your behavior. You simply cannot understand your own role and can _not_ quit your abuse behavior, but quite unlike me, you step into all sorts of discussions with _purely_ off-topic crap about other people. CAN YOU QUIT THAT MORONIC SHIT? | Oh, if you want to disprove the "cowardly" label, just put your | accusations in writing and send them to my department. Thomas Bushnell, you are the coward here. You have declined to answer my request for the the name and address of those you want me to inform of their role as the evidence of your ability to think. Fess up or shut up! | That would be the courage of your convictions in action. Your department (why did it change from your advisor?) really has nothing to do with your retarded and abusive behavior, but _you_ involve them in it, and that is the only thing I intend to inform them of. However, I would like to do this as officially as possible, so I need the name of the people who have guaranteed that you can think. If you just keep repeating this moronic line and continue to decline to provide the names and addresses of the people you want to involve, the label "coward" will stick to you for a very long time. What you keep doing here is so ridiculous that it is itself reason to inform the people _you_ want to implicate, but _you_ have to inform us all of who those people are. However, I consider your failure to grasp that your posting here on a newsgroup does not constitute violation of any rules, but your implication of your university, department, graduate program, or individual people, _does_. I want you to name those people if you are so concerned about not being labeled a coward. You are simply an abusive idiot for playing this stupid trick, but I would prefer if you were not such a chickenshit that you keep this going by inviting what you do not have the guts to complete. _Name_ the people and provide their address to this forum, or shut the fuck up. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.