Subject: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp? From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 17:28:09 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * email@example.com (MSCHAEF.COM) | Again, why does that not apply to you? I do not pretend to be concerned with "good behavior". | You seem to have (I don't know for sure) this expectation that you can | verbally pound somebody into turning the other cheek. Only those who attack me because they want me to behave better. I thus demonstrate that what they try does not work on them, either. | Speaking as the third party you referred to in your post, you seem to be | out to get _them_. I criticize _and correct_ people's mistakes. Some nutjobs go ballistic and turn everything into a personal vendetta at this point. If you are the kind who cannot read criticism of your actions without taking it personally, you will not see any difference. If you are the kind who cannot understand things in context, no amount of clarification will ever change your mind about what you think you see. But go back through this thread and see when Thomas Bushnell decides to attack me. Nice of you to speak for all third parties, though. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.