Subject: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp? From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 20:04:17 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Thomas Bushnell, BSG | Erik just said the opposite. He said that Usenet is covered by the libel | statutes. Well, I think Erik is wrong here, at least, I know some things | that *are* covered under libelous defamation, and so does Erik, so he | blusters and avoids actually doing anything that might actually force him | to defend his lies and defamations. Where are the names of the people you want to implicate? You keep making these idle and empty threats, yet refuse to do anything yourself that would show us _your_ courage of conviction. What was that concern of yours about "hypocrisy", again? Please provide the names of the people you want to implicate in this and who would constitute the proper target audience for what _you_ believe would be libelous defamation. Quit playing your stupid chickenshit games, Thomas Bushnell, _especially_ if you make such a ruckus about how other people refuse to play with you. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.