From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!deine.net!freenix!skynet.be!skynet.be!ossa.telenet-ops.be!nmaster.kpnqwest.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: AI, Semantic Web, etc. References: Mail-Copies-To: never From: Erik Naggum Message-ID: <3227463433930674@naggum.net> Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:37:14 GMT X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@KPNQwest.no X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1018474634 193.71.199.50 (Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:37:14 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:37:14 MET DST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:31414 * "Mike Beedle" | I think the world is heading to a "very confined" place with the Semantic | Web, RDF, DAML, etc.; that will exclude the possiblity of having true | distributed intelligent and mobile agents in the future. This is the whole point. Unintelligent people would be obsolete if computers got intelligent, indeed, they are already obsolete. So they resist all kinds of progress. Microsoft gives unintelligent people a warm and fuzzy feeling that no matter how retarded you are, there will always be a "for dummies" book that explains the idiot software to you so you be deluded to think you can be part of human progress. Artificial intelligence will never get past the natural unintelligence blocking its path. Computers will simply not be allowed to be smarter than a majority of the electorate, especially not if it keeps electing presidents that should have been replaced by a computer. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief. Post with compassion: http://home.chello.no/~xyzzy/kitten.jpg